Key Takeaways
-
High contact angles after grit-blasting indicate a surface preparation failure, not necessarily an instrument issue.
-
Surface energy measurement verifies grit-blasting effectiveness in real time, before bonding failures occur.
-
Contaminated or worn grit-blast media can deposit material onto the surface, preventing reliable adhesion.
-
Using a Surface Analyst™ enables manufacturers to monitor, verify, and troubleshoot surface prep processes across production lines.
The Challenge: Unexpected Surface Energy Readings
Having an efficient surface preparation process is critical for reliable bonding. But what happens when that process stops producing the expected results?
A golf club manufacturer faced this exact issue. The company used grit-blasting to prepare metal golf club heads for bonding to a composite material. To verify the process, engineers measured surface energy using a Brighton Science Surface Analyst™.
Instead of the expected low contact angles typical of freshly grit-blasted metal, measurements consistently showed contact angles of 50°–60°, values uncharacteristic of a properly prepared surface.
Initial Assumption: Instrument Calibration Failure
Based on these unexpected readings, the manufacturer concluded that the Surface Analyst™ was defective or out of calibration. A meeting was scheduled with Brighton Science to review the results and investigate the issue.
Verification: Confirming Instrument Performance
The measurements returned normal, expected values, confirming that the Surface Analyst was functioning correctly.
The next question became critical:
Could the grit-blasting process itself be the problem?
Root Cause Discovery: Contaminated Grit-Blast Media
To test this hypothesis, a manufacturer engineer took the Surface Analyst™ to a different grit blaster within the same facility. Measurements on the same type of metal surface showed contact angles as low as 5°, which aligned with the desired surface condition for bonding.
The conclusion was clear:
The original grit blaster was depositing contaminated or worn media onto the surface, rather than properly preparing it. Instead of enhancing adhesion, the process was actively preventing a reliable bond.
Outcome: Monitoring and Verification Prevent Field Failures
Without surface energy verification, the contaminated grit-blasting media would have gone unnoticed until bond failures occurred in the field.
As a result, the manufacturing team:
-
Identified and corrected the surface preparation issue early
-
Prevented downstream bonding failures
-
Added an additional Surface Analyst™ to ensure ongoing verification
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is surface preparation important in golf club manufacturing?
Surface preparation directly impacts bond strength between metal and composite components. Improper preparation can lead to weak adhesion and product failure.
What does a high contact angle indicate after grit-blasting?
High contact angles (e.g., 50°–60°) suggest surface contamination or insufficient surface energy, indicating the surface is not properly prepared for bonding.
Can grit-blasting cause surface contamination?
Yes. Worn or contaminated grit-blast media can deposit material onto the surface, reducing surface energy and preventing reliable adhesion.
How does the Surface Analyst™ help in manufacturing?
The Surface Analyst™ measures surface energy through contact angle analysis, allowing manufacturers to verify surface preparation effectiveness and identify process issues in real time.
How can manufacturers verify their surface measurement instrument is working correctly?
Using a Performance Verification Check Surface (PVCS) with known surface energy confirms the instrument is functioning properly and producing accurate measurements.
Assess Your Surface Readiness
Learn how mature your surface preparation and bonding processes really are. Download the Surface Engineering Maturity Model eBook to identify gaps, reduce risk, and improve reliability across production.
